Governance Alignment
Neo Governance Alignment (#223) organises the governance reform discussion into seven focused issues, each covering a distinct area. That way, feedback can be consolidated in one place instead of scattered across both proposal threads.
Below, each alignment area is mapped to the site topics that touch it. Read the positions here, then take your view to the relevant discussion.
Legal Structure & Constitutional Design
Whether Neo should commit to a specific legal vehicle now, how strongly on-chain governance should bind institutional action, and how to balance durability against executability.
Tokenholder Authority & Voting Model
Which governance matters require direct tokenholder authorisation, which powers stay with institutional bodies unless escalated, and whether to implement staked voting now or defer the mechanism to a later proposal.
Board Composition & Supervisor Design
How Board seats should be framed (functional expertise vs. independence), what powers the Supervisor should hold, and what independence, recusal, and removal rules apply to both bodies.
Transition Rules & Founder Role Boundaries
Whether founders face temporary restrictions during transition, how the first Board and Supervisor should be constituted, and what safeguards prevent deadlock or capture during the reset.
Public Asset Stewardship, Attribution & Control
How broadly to define Neo's public assets, which assets require consolidation versus governance controls and disclosure, and what approvals govern major asset actions.
Accountability, Historical Review & Enforcement Scope
Whether reform should be forward-looking only or also mandate review of historical matters, what thresholds trigger investigation, and how to avoid both impunity and overreach.
Tokenomics & Redistribution Measures
Whether economic restructuring (staking, GAS redistribution, NEO divisibility, asset reallocation) should be bundled with governance reform or deferred, and which economic measures are prerequisites versus later proposals.